RISC-V: A Baremetal Introduction using C++. Conclusion.

  • The toolchain using Platform IO supported modern C++ with a small configuration change.
  • The startup code required some assembly, but was mostly was very readable C++.
  • Drivers accessed via MMIO could be completely abstracted — or wrapped to simply provide convenient access to hardware registers.
  • We could specify system clock delays in human-readable units with zero run time cost.
  • Access to special system registers could be abstracted, and I propose we can abstract standard and custom instructions via C++ to take full advantage of RISC-V.
  • Interrupts were not so simple, while we can use them as C++ lambda’s it’s not a zero-cost abstraction and the implementation was not straightforward. However, the plain old C callback works fine here.

C++ Benefits?

  • Object oriented abstractions can be made more efficient than traditional C abstractions via static polymorphism and compile-time evaluation (constexpr/consteval).
  • The same object oriented abstractions can also simplify verification by making interfaces interchangeable, which can simplify unit testing and mock interfaces. For example, we could replace the timer driver with a host emulation version. We could even replace the MMIO and system register classes with a mock and run all this code via host emulation. Static assertions and other compile-time evaluation can check interfaces at compile-time.

C++ Downsides?

RISC-V Downsides?

RISC-V Future?

--

--

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Phil Mulholland

Phil Mulholland

Experienced in Distributed Systems, Event-Driven Systems, Firmware for SoC/MCU, Systems Simulation, Network Monitoring and Analysis, Automated Testing and RTL.